Sample size calculation based on T/R ratio [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Tina – India, 2014-05-16 13:38 (4418 d 09:10 ago) – Posting: # 12955
Views: 8,429

Dear all,

I have a very basic question in statistics.
  1. Why is the sample size different if we were to calculate on assuming (95 to 105) vs 90 to 110? Why is (90 to 110) higher than calculating sample size for (95 to 105)?

    Ideally to have an allowance of 10 should have higher sample size than to have an allowance of 20.

  2. (95 to 105) vs (90 to 110)—Which assumption (for calculating sample size) is preferred by the regulators

  3. If regulators are fine with both, can we not take the option of (95 to 105) as it helps with lesser costs due to lesser sample size
Kind regards,
Tina


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
132 visitors (0 registered, 132 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5