forget the partial replicate [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-10-18 02:14 (4625 d 04:29 ago) – Posting: # 11680
Views: 17,565

Hi Niraj,

❝ We have a data of partial replicate (TRR,RRT,RTR) pilot study and we have within-subject variability of reference formulation.

❝ Now suppose we want to estimate sample size for pivotal partial replicate (TRR,RRT,RTR) study using pilot study results.


As John suggested go with PowerTOST. I would abandon the lousy partial replicate and opt for a fully replicated 3-period design (TRT|RTR) instead. If by any chance you are not allowed to scale (sWR <0.294), the partial replicate sometimes fails to converge in any (!) software. If that happens, you are in trouble. You have performed a study and are not able get a result (maybe TYPE=FA0(1) instead of TYPE=FA0(2) works – see this thread).
BTW, for HVDs/HVDPs I would never assume 90% < GMR <111% even if you saw such a GMR in the pilot. The GMR might jump around between studies. Don’t be overly optimistic.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
152 visitors (0 registered, 152 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5