CVintra < CVtotal? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-10-07 16:14 (4638 d 03:51 ago) – Posting: # 11618
Views: 8,996

Hi Anu,

❝ Calculated the Intrasubject CV(%) came out 5.83 % (yes its very low).


I’m still not sure whether your calculations are correct. You got a total CV of ~1.4% which is smaller than CVintra? BTW, a CVintra of 5.83% for phosphate excretion in urine is hardly to believe.

❝ With the help of Fartssie Sample Size Calculation sheet and R-Software, I find sample size. For this study I have added the values of SD(0.17) & Difference (0.69) in the equivalence crossover and got sample size 5.


Haven’t used FARTSSIE.xls for ages, but you need the CV, not the SD. However,
library(PowerTOST)
sampleN.TOST(logscale=FALSE, theta0=-0.69, theta1=-2.45, theta2=2.45, CV=0.0583)
+++++++++++ Equivalence test - TOST +++++++++++
            Sample size estimation
-----------------------------------------------
Study design:  2x2 crossover
untransformed data (additive model)

alpha = 0.05, target power = 0.8
BE margins        = -2.45 ... 2.45
Null (true) diff. = -0.69,  CV = 0.0583

Sample size (total)
 n     power
4   1.000000

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
186 visitors (0 registered, 186 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5