CVinter > CVintra! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-09-27 15:34 (6840 d 04:11 ago) – Posting: # 1139
Views: 13,105

Dear stat_be!

❝ […] my doubts related to inter subject CV% and intra subject CV%.


So you are talking about a cross-over design.

❝ 1. Can inter subject CV% greater than intra subject CV? if yes then in what situation it may happen and what conclusion can be drawn on that basis?


Yes, this is the rule. In a cross-over design the PK responses within a particular subject are compared (between occasions).
I hardly can imagine a situation where variability between subjects (i.e., Brown vs Blair) is lower than within a subject (i.e., Brown on day 1 vs Brown on day 2). Although theoretical possible from a statistical point of view, such a behaviour is counterintuitive, and IMHO not a single case is described in the literature.
BTW, the expectation of CVintra < CVinter leads to the general preference of cross-over designs over parallel designs in BE studies.

❝ 2. what are the formulas to calculate to both of them from GLM Anova?


For formulas see this post.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
173 visitors (0 registered, 173 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5