Partial replicate design, EMA evaluation, Type I error [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-08-09 17:29 (4694 d 18:25 ago) – Posting: # 11255
Views: 6,683

Dear d_labes,

happy birthday :party:

Very interesting. Why not aim for publication of such data? They could be interesting to a very wide audience.

Btw: Talking about CVwT sound odd for a 3-period study where just the ref is replicated. Can you elaborate how these sims were performed?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5