load() ??? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-01 17:22 (4858 d 22:32 ago) – Posting: # 10141
Views: 9,624

Dear Detlew,

welcome back; hope you had a nice vacation. :smoke:

❝ ❝ I prefer require(package) over load(package) because the former loads the package only if not already loaded (saves some fractions of a second). ;-)

❝ May be you meant library(PowerTOST) instead of load(PowerTOST) or missed I somefink here?


Oops; sure.

❝ I must confess that I never understood really the difference between require(...) and library(..)


require(…) loads the package only if not already loaded. library(…) loads in all cases. Therefore the former might be a little bit faster.


Edit: PowerTOST 1.1-02 (2013-02-28) available at CRAN.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
154 visitors (0 registered, 154 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5