drcampos
★    

Brazil,
2008-09-09 05:34
(5706 d 22:20 ago)

Posting: # 2339
Views: 4,767
 

 Deconvolution [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

Dear All,

I would like to know why in a deconvolution procedure (Wagner Nelson or Loo Riegelman) the 100% of fraction absorbed is not achieved in Tmax? For example, plasma concentration versus time figure with Tmax = 3h and fraction absorbed versus time figure with 100% absorved in 8h (only 60 - 70% in 3h (Tmax).

Thank you in advance.

Daniel Rossi de Campos
Brazil
Ohlbe
★★★

France,
2008-09-09 19:22
(5706 d 08:33 ago)

@ drcampos
Posting: # 2344
Views: 3,912
 

 Deconvolution

Dear Dr de Campos,

I am not a specialist in this field. But could the answer have a link with this discussion ? (See in particular my message and Helmut's response to it).

Regards
Ohlbe
drcampos
★    

Brazil,
2008-09-09 23:14
(5706 d 04:40 ago)

@ Ohlbe
Posting: # 2345
Views: 3,926
 

 Deconvolution

Dear Ohlbe,

Merci beaucoup! Your message and Helmut's response were perfect for the question about Tmax and t1/2! The discussion and examples answered my question.

regards,

Daniel Rossi de Campos
Brazil
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
110 visitors (1 registered, 109 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5