Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-10-18 09:39 CEST (UTC+2h)
 
samar sameh
Junior

Jordan,
2017-10-04 13:58

Posting: # 17854
Views: 560
 

 Determination of calibration range [Bioanalytics]

Dear Collegues :
I have 2 questions regarding calibration range determination, and I will appreciate your response:

1. Is there a limit for Upper/Lower ratio for setting the range?.
2. Should we consider the Linear Model as the simplist regression method?


Thanks in advance
Shuanghe
Regular

Spain,
2017-10-04 16:23

@ samar sameh
Posting: # 17856
Views: 490
 

 Determination of calibration range

Hi Samar,

» 1. Is there a limit for Upper/Lower ratio for setting the range?.

As far as I know there's no such requirement, at least not in the guidelines that I know of.

But just for my curiosity, why do you want to set limit for U/L ratio?

Usually, upper limit should be determined based on information of expected Cmax of your product. Consider the variability of Cmax (do not use the reported mean Cmax from literature) when choosing the suitable upper limit. I would choose at least mean + 2sd, preferably mean+3sd, as upper limit.

As for lower limit, minimum requirement is <5% of Cmax though personally I usually choose a bit lower than that. In this case, the Cmax I prefer is mean-3sd.

Also, I'd check various sources for a better idea of what the "expected maximum concentration" will be. For the same strength and formulation, you might be surprised to find very different Cmax in different sources.

» 2. Should we consider the Linear Model as the simplist regression method?

Again, I don't think there's guidance requiring only linear model, though the simplest method is preferable. I vaguely recall there's certain guideline mentioned that if the simpler model is ok, then you should not use more complicated model. If you cannot find linear model in the minimum range as mentioned above, I think other model is OK.

Let's see if other members have different opinion.

All the best,
Shuanghe
nobody
Senior

2017-10-04 19:10

@ Shuanghe
Posting: # 17857
Views: 477
 

 Determination of calibration range

Range for calibration is given by the maximum concentrations you expect (upper limit) and the reasonably achievable LLOQ, determined by the LLOD as well as the clinical need to determine such low concentrations. So it depends on your study design (dose, population etc.) and the goal you want to achieve (preclinical, pilot, screening, or pivotal study).

The larger the range you cover, the more likely you will NOT find your data set to be homoscedastic (i.e. equal variance over the concentration range), which is a necessary prerequisite for simple linear regression to be used. Normally you will find a rather constant CV% over a large part of your calibration range. Here you use weighted linear regression. This will massively improve accuracy of your calculated concentrations at the lower end of your calibration curve.

Non-linear methods are not regularly necessary for typical instrumental analytics. These come more into play with stuff like ELISA, radio-receptor assays and stuff like that.

Hope that help.

Kindest regards, nobody
Helmut
Hero
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2017-10-04 21:19

@ nobody
Posting: # 17858
Views: 468
 

 Determination of calibration range

Hi nobody and everybody,

» Non-linear methods are not regularly necessary for typical instrumental analytics.

Might be required in MS as well. A classic in fluorescence detection (when quenching sets in). See also this thread and esp. the paper by Almeida er al.

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes
jag009
Hero

NJ,
2017-10-05 00:24

@ samar sameh
Posting: # 17859
Views: 460
 

 Determination of calibration range

Hi,
» 1. Is there a limit for Upper/Lower ratio for setting the range?.
No
» 2. Should we consider the Linear Model as the simplist regression method?
Yes.

John
Helmut
Hero
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2017-10-05 00:37

@ jag009
Posting: # 17860
Views: 463
 

 Determination of calibration range

Hi John,

» » 2. Should we consider the Linear Model as the simplist regression method?
» Yes.
Really? (scroll down) :-D

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes
nobody
Senior

2017-10-05 07:34

@ Helmut
Posting: # 17861
Views: 445
 

 Determination of calibration range

Tu felix Austria...

There is always a way, to make things more complicated, BUT... ;-)

Kindest regards, nobody
jag009
Hero

NJ,
2017-10-06 15:51

@ Helmut
Posting: # 17868
Views: 344
 

 Determination of calibration range

Hi Helmut!
»
» Really? (scroll down) :-D

Of course it depends on what kind of data the plot shows and not just applying a straight line and be happy :)

J

P.S. I had dinner with Laszlo back in Sept in Toronto. He told me he will be attending the Biosimilar conference this week?
Helmut
Hero
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2017-10-06 20:51

@ jag009
Posting: # 17870
Views: 322
 

 Determination of calibration range

Hi John,

» » Really? (scroll down) :-D
» Of course it depends on what kind of data the plot shows and not just applying a straight line and be happy :)

SCNR.

» He told me he will be attending the Biosimilar conference this week?

Correct. Had dinner with him yesterday. Entertaining as usual.

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes
Back to the forum Activity
 Thread view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,394 Posts in 3,725 Threads, 1,071 registered users;
34 users online (0 registered, 34 guests).

Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful,
is the basic building block of the universe.
I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen,
and that is the basic building block of the universe.    Frank Zappa

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed