Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-05-24 17:55 CEST (UTC+2h)
 
ssussu
Junior

China,
2017-09-22 07:40

Posting: # 17824
Views: 1,909
 

 Pivotal BE trial power not enough to 0.8 [Power / Sample Size]

Dear all,
I have a question about power of BE study to consulate. When we conducted a pilot trial,we got intrasubject CV and GMR data by which we calculated sample size for pivotal BE study. But, unluckily, the intrasubject CV from pivotal BE trial was larger than pilot trial, however, CI90 and point estimate were totally met the acceptance of Bioequivalence,only except the powerTOST from pivotal trial was less than 0.8.
Then, in this situation, can i make conclusion of bioequivalence? Is there any guidance to support my conclusion?

Thank you!
ElMaestro
Hero

Denmark,
2017-09-22 07:46

@ ssussu
Posting: # 17825
Views: 1,579
 

 Pivotal BE trial power not enough to 0.8

Hi Ssussu,

» (...) unluckily, the intrasubject CV from pivotal BE trial was larger than pilot trial, however, CI90 and point estimate were totally met the acceptance of Bioequivalence,only except the powerTOST from pivotal trial was less than 0.8.
» Then, in this situation, can i make conclusion of bioequivalence? Is there any guidance to support my conclusion?

Yes you have shown BE. Every guidance I can think of supports that conclusion, mainly because sample size calculation via power is based on an assumption about GMR and CV prior to the trial itself. Whether that assumption seems to hold true once the trial has been conducted is immaterial for the comparability; what is important is the confidence interval itself.

Pat yourself on the shoulder. :-)

“A ten-year, double-blind study from the Mayo Clinic concluded that even in late stages of dementia, the last to go is the lobe of the brain in charge of cafeteria layout.” (Serge Storms/Tim Dorsey).


Best regards,
ElMaestro

- Bootstrapping is a relatively new hobby of mine. I am only 30 years late to the party.
ssussu
Junior

China,
2017-09-22 09:21

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 17826
Views: 1,554
 

 Pivotal BE trial power not enough to 0.8

Dear ElMaestro,

» Pat yourself on the shoulder. :-)

Thank you so much! So glad to hear that!
Back to the forum Activity
 Thread view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
18,290 posts in 3,889 threads, 1,165 registered users;
17 users online (0 registered, 17 guests).

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.    Aldous Huxley

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed