Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-08-21 14:01 CEST (UTC+2h)
 
sudy
Junior

India,
2017-08-01 13:29
(edited by sudy on 2017-08-01 13:49)

Posting: # 17641
Views: 327
 

 Inter subject CV calculation [General Sta­tis­tics]

Hi all,
Can anyone suggest any logic on below results?

[image]


Why Inter subject CV is not calculated for Cmax?
Is this formula is correct to calculate between subject variability on log transformed data for two way cross over study?
If i calculate manually in excel, I am getting the value around 28% for cmax. But SAS gives error.
One more point i have noted that, the MSS is very low by SAS, but manually this value is very high.
Why R-square is very low for Cmax?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. [Helmut]
Helmut
Hero
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2017-08-01 14:33

@ sudy
Posting: # 17642
Views: 260
 

 √x, where x<0

Hi sudy,

next time you upload a PNG please 640px (longest side) or better only the numbers. I had a hard time to read the results. :cool:

» Why Inter subject CV is not calculated for Cmax?

Unless you want to deal with imaginary numbers, the square root of a negative value is not defined. Since ℯ(MSs – MSe)/2 = 0.994155, √–0.005845 don’t work.

» Is this formula is correct to calculate between subject variability on log transformed data for two way cross over study?

Yes. See there.

» If i calculate manually in excel, I am getting the value around 28% for cmax. But SAS gives error.

Please check what you have done in Excel. Cannot work:

A1 0.06596695
B1 0.07769188
C1 =(A1-B1)/2
D1 =EXP(C1)
E1 =D1-1
F1 =100*SQRT(E1)

What do you get? 28% is CVintra – in Excel-lingo 100*SQRT((EXP(B1)-1)).

» One more point i have noted that, the MSS is very low by SAS, but manually this value is very high.

No idea. I don’t have a crystal ball which could tell me what you are doing “manually”.

» Why R-square is very low for Cmax?

Higher variability than the ones of AUCs ⇒ lower R2. As expected.

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes
Back to the forum Activity
 Thread view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,225 Posts in 3,685 Threads, 1,056 registered users;
36 users online (0 registered, 36 guests).

The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts
as to discover new ways of thinking about them.    William Henry Bragg

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed