Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-08-24 06:56 CEST (UTC+2h)

2017-07-20 22:47

Posting: # 17586
Views: 417

 Calcitriol [Bioanalytics]

Hi all,
Is calcitriol bioanalytical method a really difficult method?

Vienna, Austria,
2017-07-21 01:07

@ jag009
Posting: # 17587
Views: 337

 Calcitriol: After 0.5 µg Cmax <2× basal level

Hi John,

» Is calcitriol bioanalytical method a really difficult method?

Define difficult. ;-)
An LLOQ of 15 pg/mL will do the job. That’s doable with a validated (!) commercial RIA.

IMHO, the design recommended in the FDA’s guidance is problematic. I don’t get the point of the FDA’s 0, –6, –12, and –18 hours sampling. Averaging (as suggested) IMHO, is crap. There is a circadian rhythm of basal levels (24 ♂ x 30–50 pg/mL). See also Rejnmark et al. 2002.*
I recommend full basal profiles in each period. A dose of 0.5 µg will be extremely difficult. Not analytically but you will be very close to basal levels. Our Cmax (unadjusted geometric mean) was 222 pg/mL after a 4 µg dose. CVintra of Cmax,adj was 27% and of AUC0–t,adj 20%. Given that, after a 0.5 µg dose you could expect an unadjusted Cmax of ~62 pg/mL at a time when basal levels are ~39 pg/mL. That’s difficult. I guess you will run into serious troubles estimating λz.
I know of another study with a 2 µg dose, where (with averaging as suggested by the FDA) the CRO only by some acrobatic means could deal with the later part of the profile. The unadjusted Cmax was 134 µg/mL and Cmax,adj 76 µg/mL (25 ♀♂).
Im pretty sure that at least the CV of Cmax will be >30% and and therefore, a candidate for RSABE. I don’t expect that demonstrating BE with a 0.5 µg dose is realistic at all. Talk to the OGD.

  • Rejnmark L, Lauridsen AL, Vestergaard P, Heickendorff L, Andreasen F, Mosekilde L. Diurnal rhythm of plas­ma 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein in postmenopausal women: relationship to plasma parathyroid hormone and calcium and phosphate metabolism. Eur J Endocrin. 2002;146:635-42. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1460635

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

2017-07-21 21:19

@ Helmut
Posting: # 17591
Views: 261

 Calcitriol: After 0.5 µg Cmax <2× basal level

Thank you Helmut! :)

Yes it's going to be difficult and such a dose. I am thinking of asking RA to get blessing from the agency about increasing the dose (multiple tablets) :)

Difficult as in difficult BA method which leads to a higher price per sample. I have heard pricing at $30USD from India! I spoke with my friends and some said the extracting method requires a kit which costs like $15USD. I don't see how (Of course it's possible but...) the pricing can be $30/sample.

Back to the forum Activity
 Thread view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,243 Posts in 3,687 Threads, 1,057 registered users;
25 users online (0 registered, 25 guests).

I try not to think with my gut.
If I’m serious about understanding the world,
thinking with anything besides my brain, as tempting as that might be,
is likely to get me into trouble.    Carl Sagan

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz