hirenpharm
☆    

Ahmedabad,
2016-04-15 21:41
(2924 d 13:19 ago)

Posting: # 16207
Views: 4,756
 

 comparative bio­avail­ability [General Sta­tis­tics]

Hi Helmut,

Can you please suggest when to use TOST (two one sided t-tests) for comparative bio availability in stead of a standard ANOVA approach using period, treatment, subjects as random effects? I was reading through
https://sphhp.buffalo.edu/content/dam/sphhp/biostatistics/Documents/techreports/UB-Biostatistics-TR1107.pdf
And also-
two one-sided tests” (TOST) proposed by Schuirmann (1987)

http://www.ncss.com/wp-content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/PASS/Equivalence_Tests_for_Two_Means_using_Differences.pdf

Dr. Hiren Mehta
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2016-04-18 16:02
(2921 d 18:58 ago)

@ hirenpharm
Posting: # 16213
Views: 3,654
 

 100(1–2α) CI

Hi Hiren,

❝ Hi Helmut,


     Not interested in the opinions of other members?


All guidelines I’m aware of recommend a 100(1–2α) confidence interval – not TOST. See also this post and the linked references.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
hirenpharm
☆    

Ahmedabad,
2016-04-21 18:28
(2918 d 16:31 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 16231
Views: 3,505
 

 100(1–2α) CI

thanks Helmut. Obviously all members' opinion matters!
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,986 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,662 registered users;
67 visitors (0 registered, 67 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5