hirenpharm
☆    

Ahmedabad,
2016-04-15 21:41
(2925 d 22:55 ago)

Posting: # 16207
Views: 4,776
 

 comparative bio­avail­ability [General Sta­tis­tics]

Hi Helmut,

Can you please suggest when to use TOST (two one sided t-tests) for comparative bio availability in stead of a standard ANOVA approach using period, treatment, subjects as random effects? I was reading through
https://sphhp.buffalo.edu/content/dam/sphhp/biostatistics/Documents/techreports/UB-Biostatistics-TR1107.pdf
And also-
two one-sided tests” (TOST) proposed by Schuirmann (1987)

http://www.ncss.com/wp-content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/PASS/Equivalence_Tests_for_Two_Means_using_Differences.pdf

Dr. Hiren Mehta
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2016-04-18 16:02
(2923 d 04:35 ago)

@ hirenpharm
Posting: # 16213
Views: 3,669
 

 100(1–2α) CI

Hi Hiren,

❝ Hi Helmut,


     Not interested in the opinions of other members?


All guidelines I’m aware of recommend a 100(1–2α) confidence interval – not TOST. See also this post and the linked references.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
hirenpharm
☆    

Ahmedabad,
2016-04-21 18:28
(2920 d 02:08 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 16231
Views: 3,520
 

 100(1–2α) CI

thanks Helmut. Obviously all members' opinion matters!
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,661 registered users;
85 visitors (1 registered, 84 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5