venkat
●    

2007-06-18 14:00
(6950 d 17:20 ago)

Posting: # 816
Views: 6,663
 

 Rivastigmine bioequivalence [Design Issues]

Dear all,

Could you guide me regards the biostudy design for Rivastigmine 6.0 mg capsules. It has some complicating factors. The FDA has no draft recommendations. It shows linear pharmacokinetics up to 3 mg BID, but is non-linear at higher doses. The innovator has conduted the bioavailabiltiy study upto 3.0 mg stating that it is very dangerous to conduct study with higher dose of 6 mg. So should I use patients for determining the bioequivalence. Alternatively should I do it at 3.0 mg and submit biowaiver for 6.0 mg. I want to have a EU submission. Please suggest

Regards,
Venkat
venkat
●    

2007-06-20 11:30
(6948 d 19:50 ago)

@ venkat
Posting: # 821
Views: 4,239
 

 Rivastigmine bioequivalence

Dear Mr.Helmut,

Could you guide me on this issue.

Regards,

Venkat
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
369 visitors (0 registered, 369 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5