ioanam
★    

Romania,
2007-03-18 01:27
(7032 d 22:32 ago)

Posting: # 584
Views: 5,077
 

 different strength [Design Issues]

Dear Sir,
I have to perform a bioequivalence study with two strengths (120 mg and 160 mg) for a modified release formulation, which are not dose proportional. The Orange book specifies only 160 mg formulation as RLD. There is also an innovator for 120 mg, but it is not listed as RLD. In that case what shall be the reference drug for 120mg strength?
Thank you.
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2007-03-18 14:21
(7032 d 09:38 ago)

@ ioanam
Posting: # 585
Views: 3,976
 

 'BE' to innovator's product which is not RLD

Dear ioanam!

Since your drug is not dose proportional, and I don't expect it will be an realistic option to administer the lowest common multiple (480mg) of test (4×120mg) and RLD (3×160mg), IMHO it would make sense to go for a comparative BA with the other innovator's 120mg formulation.

Such a procedure is not BE in FDA's sense (reference not the RLD); you must contact CDER/OGD's review staff first!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5