Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Williams’ designs more reliable?

Williams’ designs more reliable? [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2012-11-11 15:14 (4176 d 23:45 ago) – Posting: # 9531
Views: 4,455

Dear Ben,

❝ Note that I was not talking about 'more precise' results.

I did! Originally you talked about " ... more reliable results ... ".
So give me an impression what this could be and how to quantify this?

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Replicated cross over with fixed number of periods martin 2012-11-05 17:31 [Design Issues]
- Additional information martin 2012-11-06 11:50
  - Quick Q for my clarification ElMaestro 2012-11-06 12:09
    - Quick Q for my clarification martin 2012-11-06 12:29
      - 5 periods ElMaestro 2012-11-06 12:43
      - Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designs Helmut 2012-11-06 14:07
        
        Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designs Ben 2012-11-07 21:10
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? d_labes 2012-11-08 08:29
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? Ben 2012-11-09 18:20
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable?d_labes 2012-11-11 14:14
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? Ben 2012-11-18 13:20
        
        Frequentists vs. Bayesians Helmut 2012-11-18 14:48
        
        Frequentists vs. Bayesians Ben 2012-11-18 15:28

Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,665 registered users;
82 visitors (0 registered, 82 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity. Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz