AUC72: NDAs [Design Issues]
Hi Helmut,
Sorry I wasn't clear in the last email. I meant dosage strength proportionality study (2x100 vs 1x200), not dose proportionality study (100 mg vs 2x100 mg).
In any case, it makes sense to use AUC0-72 for BA studies since I am dealing with the same compound, same indication etc etc and just a change from a tablet to a capsule formulation (vice versa)
Thanks
John
❝ IMHO that’s an exception. Think about nonlinear PK (saturation, autoinduction). In dose-proportionality studies we are not only interested in absorption but also in detecting potential changes in clearance and therefore would assess primarily AUC0-∞.
Sorry I wasn't clear in the last email. I meant dosage strength proportionality study (2x100 vs 1x200), not dose proportionality study (100 mg vs 2x100 mg).
In any case, it makes sense to use AUC0-72 for BA studies since I am dealing with the same compound, same indication etc etc and just a change from a tablet to a capsule formulation (vice versa)
Thanks
John
Complete thread:
- Parallel study as pilot for long half life drug jag009 2012-05-07 15:13 [Design Issues]
- Parallel study as pilot for long half life drug Dr_Dan 2012-05-07 16:00
- Parallel study as pilot for long half life drug d_labes 2012-05-07 16:24
- Parallel study as pilot for long half life drug jag009 2012-05-07 18:15
- AUC72 Helmut 2012-05-07 19:31
- AUC72 jag009 2012-05-07 20:15
- AUC72 Dr_Dan 2012-05-08 12:17
- AUC72 jag009 2012-05-10 15:15
- AUC72: NDAs Helmut 2012-05-10 15:56
- AUC72: NDAsjag009 2012-05-14 15:22
- AUC72: NDAs Helmut 2012-05-10 15:56
- AUC72 jag009 2012-05-10 15:15
- AUC72 Dr_Dan 2012-05-08 12:17
- AUC72 jag009 2012-05-07 20:15
- AUC72 Helmut 2012-05-07 19:31
- Parallel study as pilot for long half life drug Dr_Dan 2012-05-07 16:00
