Blinding in Canadian BE Study [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by akinapally – 2012-05-09 14:23 (5146 d 18:43 ago) – Posting: # 8540
Views: 3,359

Dear Mr Pravin,

section 4.10 Identification of Adverse Reactions and Side Effects

as per guidelines

In some cases, adverse drug reactions are due to factors other than the active ingredient in a formulation. The rate of absorption and excipients within formulations may affect the frequency,onset, and severity of adverse drug reactions. The incidence, severity, and duration of adverse reactions and side effects observed during the study must be reported. The probability that an adverse effect is drug-induced is to be judged by the investigator.
The same observer and format for eliciting and recording information on adverse drug reactions should be used for all subjects. Questions concerning adverse reactions and side effects should be asked on each study day by the "blinded" observer.

6.9 Quality Control for Spiked Samples

A minimum of six QC samples, composed of three concentrations in duplicate, must be blinded and analysed with each batch of study samples for each analytical day or run.


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
146 visitors (0 registered, 146 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5