AUC72 [Design Issues]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2012-05-07 22:15 (5147 d 10:33 ago) – Posting: # 8529
Views: 5,703

Hi Helmut,

You do look like the guy in the picture --> Highlander :cool:

Well I did some literature research this morning and found an article which studied the pk of a combination product that contained my drug of interest. It was a simple one arm study (one product, single dose exposure). Based on the mean AUC and SD, I think the inter CV is around 30% (I know I know, this is rough and dirty..)

Regarding truncate AUC (72 hours), yes that would help and it is an IR formulation. But I am still looking for a month for washout + 3 days...

The half-life of 100-120 hr is the reported mean but there have been values of 150 hr reported as well. I still need to find out what the lab will have as the LLoQ..

Regarding LLoQ, is there any requirement as to how low you have to go? I mean if I am aiming for less than 5% of the theoretical Cmax, would that do?


Claymore? I always wanted a samurai sword myself :-D

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
204 visitors (0 registered, 204 guests [including 29 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are no dangerous thoughts;
thinking itself is dangerous.    Hannah Arendt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5