Some school math [Software]
Dear AB,
Sorry but none is correct
. If you have transformed your PK metric (AUC or Cmax) logarithmically, as the Progesterone guidance recommends, the ESTIMATE statement in the step "Intermediate analysis - ilat" gives you the difference
To cite the guidance:
"From the dataset IGLM2, calculate the following:
IGLM2:
The ratio µT/µR is sometimes called geometric mean ratio (GMR). But this is only an approximately valid statement.
See for that
Hauschke, Steinijans, Pigeot
"Bioequivalence Studies in Drug Development"
Wiley, Chichester (2007)
Chapter 3.2.2 "The lognormal distribution"
Ouch! Helmut has outpaced my post
.
Full ACK with his statement concerning ASAP.
Sorry but none is correct
. If you have transformed your PK metric (AUC or Cmax) logarithmically, as the Progesterone guidance recommends, the ESTIMATE statement in the step "Intermediate analysis - ilat" gives you the difference estimate=log(µT)-log(µR). Recalling your school math you will obtain the point estimator back-transformed to the original values byexp(estimate) = exp(log(µT)-log(µR)) = exp(log(µT))/exp(log(µR)) = µT/µR. To cite the guidance:
"From the dataset IGLM2, calculate the following:
IGLM2:
pointest=exp(estimate);
..."The ratio µT/µR is sometimes called geometric mean ratio (GMR). But this is only an approximately valid statement.
See for that
Hauschke, Steinijans, Pigeot
"Bioequivalence Studies in Drug Development"
Wiley, Chichester (2007)
Chapter 3.2.2 "The lognormal distribution"
Ouch! Helmut has outpaced my post
.Full ACK with his statement concerning ASAP.
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- which SAS code to use AB 2012-04-27 14:38 [Software]
- As slow as possible Helmut 2012-04-27 15:01
- Some school mathd_labes 2012-04-27 15:21
- Some school math AB 2012-04-28 07:13
