LSMeans? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-01-26 09:34 (5251 d 03:08 ago) – Posting: # 8004
Views: 3,590

Dear EM, dear Helmut,

First thanx for your thoughts.

@ EM:

❝ ❝ -What is the geometric mean in replicate cross-over studies? Overall or calculated for each replicate?

❝ They mean lsmeans or model effects, I hope ...

:ponder: Do you really won't me to do a model fit (which if we are allowed to only consider Reference AUC values?) for the log-transformed values, leaving out each subjects values in turn, and then apply the 5% criterion via exponentiated LSmeans?
My first thought was simpler: Calculate the geometric means leaving out each subjects values in turn and then calculate the percentage of the individual value versus geometric mean (i.e. taken the guidance text literally).

❝ Pick the one that fits.

How do you define "fit"?

❝ "Geometric mean" is a term that should be banned ...

Totally :confused:
What the hell do you have against geometric means? Enlighten me.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
162 visitors (0 registered, 162 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5