Not that easy at all [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-24 14:26 (5252 d 14:10 ago) – Posting: # 7994
Views: 8,318

Dear Kotu!

❝ suppose i got cv 32.5 and t/r ratio is 97%. how to decided the sample size for further study.


Some remarks following D. Labes’ post. HVDs/HVDPs show also fluctuating PEs across studies. Quoting the two Lászlós:

Larger absolute differences between the two logarithmic means can be noted in the various BE studies when the within-subject variation is higher. Therefore, it is recommended that a 10% deviation between the means, i.e. a true GMR = 1.10, be considered when the sample size tables in the Appendix are used.

Since power curves are not symmetrical in raw scale I would recommend the more conservative 0.90 instead of 1.10 – which would give for CV 35% and 80% power:
    3-period  4-period
EMA    51       34
FDA    37       26

Since you expect a CV of 32.5% it might well be the case that in the actual study the reference does not classify as a HVD/HVDP – which would change the regulatory requirement to unscaled ABE!
  CV%  3-period  4-period
 30       60       40
 27.5     51       34

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
152 visitors (0 registered, 152 guests [including 48 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5