study sample analysis [Bioanalytics]
Dear Mustafa!
Regulatory or scientific POV?.
See EMA’s GL (2011) Section 5.1. I would go with a single batch whenever possible. Even if you have low inter-batch variability, you might see a certain shift within the plasma profiles. If samples are analyzed in a cross-over manner, AUC and Cmax should not be affected, but estimating the elimination might give you headaches.
❝ […] from regulatory point of view.
❝
❝ scientifically, would it be acceptable to not analyze all study samples from a in a single run (i.e multiple runs) as long as the bioanalytical method has completely been validated and documented acceptable inter-assay variability?.
❝ is there any justification behind the acceptance of single / multiple run(s) analysis results?
Regulatory or scientific POV?.
❝ is there any references/guidelines that i can refer to regarding this matter?
See EMA’s GL (2011) Section 5.1. I would go with a single batch whenever possible. Even if you have low inter-batch variability, you might see a certain shift within the plasma profiles. If samples are analyzed in a cross-over manner, AUC and Cmax should not be affected, but estimating the elimination might give you headaches.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- study sample analysis Falisa_Mustafa 2012-01-20 04:06 [Bioanalytics]
- study sample analysisHelmut 2012-01-20 13:22
