Duplicate LLOQ and ULOQ [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-20 14:09 (5256 d 20:05 ago) – Posting: # 7980
Views: 6,156

Dear Ohlbe!

❝ What most people do is that they only use one of the two replicates of the LLOQ and ULOQ samples. Usually the first replicate is used,…


Really most people? That’s strange to me. Why the first and not the second? Why not both?

❝ Some people take whichever value gives the highest R2, but I don't like that (I don't consider R2 to be a relevant parameter).


Right. R² is meaningless in calibration (if you prefer the statistical term: inverse regression). A nice reference (based on backcalculated concentrations):

Almeida AM, Castel-Branco MM, and AC Falcão
Linear regression for calibration lines revisited: weighting schemes for bioanalytical methods
Journal of Chromatography B 774, 215–22 (2002)


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5