intrasubject [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-16 15:50 (5264 d 02:30 ago) – Posting: # 7950
Views: 6,479

Dear Karthik!

❝ they asked to calculate both intrasubject and intersubject CV.

❝ for intersubject they asked to calculate from art.mean and std dev.


OK, we had that before. That’s not correct, but calculate it according to their form anyhow.

❝ for intrasubject they given the statement like that

❝ according to the query 'the intrasubject variability in the reference literature is not consistent with your value'


I guess your CVintra is (much?) lower than the one given in literature? If pub­lished studies were not using an awful bioanalytical method (high CV) WHO might be suspicious that something went wrong in the study, e.g., conversion of a metabolite to the parent in the ion-source in LC/MS-MS. Since metabolites generally have lower CVs that the parent you will get a lower CV than with a method which separates parent & metabolites. Are your mean concentrations substantially higher than in the literature? If yes, get prepared for an inspection.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5