Full Replicate BE study! Calculation Issues [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by luvblooms  – India, 2011-12-16 17:46 (5296 d 07:27 ago) – Posting: # 7783
Views: 5,584

Dear All

Regards!!:flower:

We did a full replicate BE study for EU submission a few days back with 40 volunteers.
The %ISCV observed for reference product was found to be 28% (in pilot it was 43%:confused:), thus we have to comply with normal 80-125% CI limit criteria, considering the study as a two way study.

Now, if I am considering the study as a normal two way crossover study what option I have
1) take mean of test and reference (e.g. T1+T2/2 and R1+R2/2 and 40 volunteers for each) and run the stats (tried this and study is failing on lower side at 78%)
or
2) I should run the stat for T1+T2 Vs R1+R2 (using total 80 data for each test and reference, tried this and study is passing)

Now which is the right way Statistically, Practically and Regulatory approach wise.

Thanks in advance!!!!

Luv

P.s: I know I am sounding as a moron but need some lesson on this for sure ;-)

~A happy Soul~

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
164 visitors (1 registered, 163 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5