ANOVA party prevails [BE/BA News]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-03-17 11:00 (3405 d 02:27 ago) – Posting: # 6770
Views: 28,266

(edited by d_labes on 2011-03-17 14:06)

Dear All,

that makes me dumbfound! :crying:
Seems the ANOVA fraction of EMA statisticians has triumphed all along the line. Thus our crossing fingers was of no effect.

To summarize my understanding of this so-called "clarification":Do you think I have got their points?

The rationale behind that all I can't and will not discuss seriously :no:.
I thank my God that I'm only a quantum-theoretical chemist educationally and not a statistician. Thus I must not understand :cool:.

BTW: The CVWT of Method C from SAS for dataset II is 3.87%.
Proc MIXED is complaining: The Mixed Procedure
Convergence criteria met but final hessian is not positive definite.

This is a strong sign of an over-specified model. That may be one of the sources of wider CIs compared to the simpler models.



Complete thread:

 Admin contact
20,819 posts in 4,356 threads, 1,447 registered users;
online 17 (2 registered, 15 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics are no substitute for judgment.    Henry Clay

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz