Bear: feature requests [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-12-09 09:48 (4886 d 04:20 ago) – Posting: # 6280
Views: 12,732

Dear Yung-jin,

I have some another ones, but more bullet proofs rather than new features:

In the NCA module in choosing one of the automatically methods the user is left with errors not so easy to figure out where they came from in the following instances:IMHO it would be wise and more smart to test these cases and throw a warning in user understandable words for those cases and continue(!) with the evaluation of the remaining concentration time curves.
Eventually it would be best to have some fall-back if a method can't applied. F.i. use the points after Cmax if TTT does not yield at least 3 points, use eventually even Cmax, tmax if otherwise n<2 or some similar. Of course with a warning to the user.

Moreover: In the manual selection of time points I have observed:
BTW: If you have very much spare time :-D I would highly recommend to refactor the bear code. It's a nightmare to make a code inspection and it must be a nightmare for you to maintain it, I suppose. I know it's naturally grown during development, but ...

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,654 registered users;
119 visitors (0 registered, 119 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5