Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

BE parallel design [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2007-04-04 17:31 (6225 d 03:09 ago) – Posting: # 624
Views: 17,390

Hi Jaime!

You recycled my data!

❝ So the final results are (point estimate and 90% confidence interval):

❝ 83.657% (63.514% - 110.189%)

❝ WinNonlin: 83.6572% (63.5100% - 110.1958%)

❝ EquivTest: 83.66% (63.51% - 110.18%)

❝

❝ Slight differences seen in results are not uncommon...

Full ACK!
I don’t know which versions you were using; I'm getting exactly the same results in WinNonlin (v5.2) and EquivTest/PK.

Kinetica (v4.4.1) comes up with:
83.6572% (63.514% – 110.19%)

You never know when rounding will hit you – and don’t dare asking the software vendor for the algorithm…

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• BE parallel design pkpdpkpd 2007-04-03 17:45 [General Sta­tis­tics] 
  • BE parallel design Jaime_R 2007-04-03 18:58
    • BE parallel design pkpdpkpd 2007-04-03 19:07
      • BE parallel design Jaime_R 2007-04-03 19:41
        • BE parallel design pkpdpkpd 2007-04-03 20:14
          • BE parallel design Jaime_R 2007-04-03 20:29
            • BE parallel design pkpdpkpd 2007-04-03 21:48
              • BE parallel design Jaime_R 2007-04-04 15:14
                • BE parallel designHelmut 2007-04-04 15:31
                  • BE parallel design pkpdpkpd 2007-04-04 17:32
                  • BE parallel design Jaime_R 2007-04-04 20:33
                • BE parallel design Sathya 2008-09-01 07:21
                • BE parallel design Sathya 2008-09-04 12:37