simul ants with no ties [Nonparametrics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-09-16 13:19 (5759 d 10:39 ago) – Posting: # 5917
Views: 27,372

Dear Helmut!

❝ Yep. For n1=n2=10 I would expect 0.9108...


Yeah, but ... without ties.
10 000 sims each with round(,5) in the code and only wilcox.exact():
run 1  0.9096
run 2  0.9076
run 3  0.9125
run 4  0.9104
run 5  0.9138
-------------
mean   0.91078

Each run (10 000 sims) only approx. 100 s!

The mean seems very close to your expectation :cool:.
---[nitpicking]---------------------------------
> 1-2*pwilcox(max(1,qwilcox(0.1/2,10,10))-1,10,10)
[1] 0.9107904
---[/nitpicking]--------------------------------


What I'm very curious of is that scatter between the runs. Seems that one has to simulate at least 100 000 or more datasets to get a reliable coverage.
To much beer in case of coin:wilcox_exac() :-D.

BTW: with round to five decimals I have observed anyhow up to 10 sets with ties among the 10 000 sims.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
130 visitors (0 registered, 130 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5