NTIDs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Dr Andrew Leary – Ireland, 2010-08-29 11:15 (5770 d 04:00 ago) – Posting: # 5864
Views: 6,769

Hello Helmut

❝ Levothyroxine is not considered an NTID in Canada. No product specific GL in the US, but Liothyronine is also not considered an NTID.


In fact, there is a US guideline (Levothyroxine), but it is very controversial, with a number of critical papers written about same in the last 10 years.

❝ In Europe NTIDs are assessed on a case-by-case basis. Little is published yet (tacrolimus: AUC 90%-111%, Cmax 80%-125%; ciclosporine: AUC and Cmax 90%-111%).

❝ Would be interesting to know how Denmark will defend their requirements (updated on 8 Feb 2010) in the light of European harmonization (all immunosuppressives AUC and Cmax 90%-111% vs. EMA-Q&A tacrolimus AUC 90%-111%, Cmax 80%-125%).


Fair comment. I'll tell my client to seek regulatory advice before proceeding.

Kind regards

Andrew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
215 visitors (0 registered, 215 guests [including 95 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5