BE study designs [Design Issues]

posted by Essar – 2006-01-17 05:53 (7111 d 02:48 ago) – Posting: # 55
Views: 29,431

❝ Your design is not balanced in respect to all effects in the model, in other words, 3 combinations of treatments are missing. The chance of regulatory acceptance of a 3×3 is close to zero.

❝ The simplest design you may apply is a Williams’ design (3-treatment, 3-period, 6-sequence):


Dear Helmut,
Thanks once again for taking the time out.

When you say that chance of regulatory acceptance of 3x3 is close to zero, you mean specifically for 3x3x3, or it is applicable to 3x3x6 design also?

Also, can you please let me know the reason for the same.

Now, I will start hunting for the references you have given me.

Regards,
Essar

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,681 registered users;
58 visitors (0 registered, 58 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5