Validating vs. WinNonlin... [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2010-04-26 02:09 (5111 d 15:48 ago) – Posting: # 5219
Views: 55,821

Dear Helmut,

BTW, may I ask if the analysis of a replicate BE study is acceptable with WNL v5.x or v6.x? WNL uses a mixed effect model, too, to analyze a replicate BE.

❝ D. Labes referred to one of my old posts: WinNonlin's method (assuming equal variances) is flawed - even in the current releases WinNonlin 5.3 and Phoenix/WinNonlin 6.1.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.1:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,991 posts in 4,827 threads, 1,648 registered users;
54 visitors (1 registered, 53 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5