Dataset [🇷 for BE/BA]
Dear bears,
Are you trying to confuse me? The built-in dataset consists of 20 (10:10) observations. For comparisons can we please stick to this dataset, lnAUC0t only?
For non-bears, here is the dataset (balanced, 20 subjects) for download.
With this code
I get
As expected the CI is slightly wider as the ones obtained by simple lm or the strange lme (83.312-123.920). Have a look at the plot.
Edit: Remove thered part of the code. The line should read
THX to D. Labes for beta-testing. [Helmut]
❝ When I revised bear today, […] (with built-in dataset in bear v2.4.2) for CIs.
Are you trying to confuse me? The built-in dataset consists of 20 (10:10) observations. For comparisons can we please stick to this dataset, lnAUC0t only?
subj drug Cmax AUC0t AUC0INF lnCmax lnAUC0t lnAUC0INF
1 1 1 88.6 1510 1530 4.4841 7.3199 7.3330
2 2 1 52.5 883 890 3.9608 6.7833 6.7912
3 3 1 92.0 1650 1670 4.5218 7.4085 7.2226
4 4 1 56.0 1015 1050 4.0254 6.9226 6.9565
5 5 1 84.0 1556 1570 4.4308 7.3499 7.3588
6 6 1 84.8 1412 1432 4.4403 7.2528 7.2668
7 7 1 83.0 1353 1356 4.4188 7.2101 7.2123
8 8 1 96.4 1443 1450 4.5685 7.2745 7.2793
9 9 1 68.1 1299 1305 4.2210 7.1694 7.1740
10 10 1 33.5 560 570 3.5115 6.3279 6.3456
11 11 2 70.3 1284 1290 4.2528 7.1577 7.1624
12 12 2 73.5 1391 1340 4.2973 7.2378 7.2004
13 13 2 50.2 873 890 3.9160 6.7719 6.7920
14 14 2 62.2 1211 1230 4.1304 7.0992 7.1148
15 15 2 74.1 1233 1255 4.3054 7.1172 7.1349
16 16 2 60.4 1172 1182 4.1010 7.0665 7.0750
17 17 2 60.4 1172 1185 4.1010 7.0665 7.0775
18 18 2 75.3 1336 1355 4.3215 7.1974 7.2116
19 19 2 76.8 1348 1355 4.3412 7.2064 7.2116
20 20 2 82.9 1419 1425 4.4176 7.2577 7.2619
For non-bears, here is the dataset (balanced, 20 subjects) for download.
With this code
# Change to folder containg data files in RGui!
TotalData <- read.csv("PAR-BEAR.txt", header=T, sep="\t", dec=".")
attach(TotalData)
subj <- as.factor(subj)
drug <- as.factor(drug)
boxplot(lnAUC0t ~ drug, col="lightgray", yl)
points(jitter(as.numeric(drug), factor=0.25), lnAUC0t, col="blue")
result <- t.test(lnAUC0t ~ drug, var.equal = FALSE, conf.level = 0.90)
result
cat("T/R [%] with alpha 0.05 (90% CI)", sep=" ", fill=TRUE)
tbldiff <- matrix(
c(as.numeric(exp(diff(result$estimate))),
sort(as.numeric(exp(-result$conf.int)))),
byrow = TRUE, nrow = 1)
dimnames(tbldiff) <- list("Ratio",
c(" Point Estimate",
" CL90 lower",
" CL90 upper" ))
round(tbldiff*100,3)
I get
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: lnAUC0t by drug
t = -0.1392, df = 12.043, p-value = 0.8916
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
90 percent confidence interval:
-0.2199223 0.1880423
sample estimates:
mean in group 1 mean in group 2
7.10189 7.11783
T/R [%] with alpha 0.05 (90% CI)
Point Estimate CL90 lower CL90 upper
Ratio 101.607 82.858 124.598
As expected the CI is slightly wider as the ones obtained by simple lm or the strange lme (83.312-123.920). Have a look at the plot.
Edit: Remove the
boxplot(lnAUC0t ~ drug, col="lightgray")
THX to D. Labes for beta-testing. [Helmut]
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Parallel bears meeting at random in infinity d_labes 2010-04-22 11:43 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- Parallel bears meeting at random in infinity ElMaestro 2010-04-22 12:53
- Parallel groups in bear - CIs d_labes 2010-04-22 14:00
- Parallel groups in bear - CIs ElMaestro 2010-04-22 21:47
- Parallel groups in bear - CIs d_labes 2010-04-23 09:09
- Parallel groups in bear - CIs yjlee168 2010-04-25 23:29
- Parallel groups in bear - CIs ElMaestro 2010-04-22 21:47
- Parallel groups in bear - CIs d_labes 2010-04-22 14:00
- Parallel bears meeting at random in infinity yjlee168 2010-04-22 23:09
- Modelling Parallel bears d_labes 2010-04-23 09:12
- Modelling Parallel bears yjlee168 2010-04-23 21:14
- Validating vs. WinNonlin... Helmut 2010-04-24 00:28
- Validating vs. WinNonlin... yjlee168 2010-04-24 19:36
- Validating vs. WinNonlin... yjlee168 2010-04-26 00:09
- Validating vs. WinNonlin... Helmut 2010-04-26 01:29
- WNL in replicate BE yjlee168 2010-04-26 08:59
- WNL in replicate BE Helmut 2010-04-26 16:15
- WNL in replicate BE yjlee168 2010-04-26 08:59
- Validating vs. WinNonlin... Helmut 2010-04-26 01:29
- Modelling Parallel bears yjlee168 2010-04-25 19:34
- Modelling Parallel bears ElMaestro 2010-04-25 20:40
- DatasetHelmut 2010-04-25 22:38
- Dataset yjlee168 2010-04-25 22:44
- Dataset Helmut 2010-04-26 01:13
- Dataset yjlee168 2010-04-26 08:16
- NCA → Statistical analysis for parallel study Helmut 2010-04-26 13:12
- NCA → Statistical analysis for parallel study yjlee168 2010-04-26 18:43
- NCA → Statistical analysis for parallel study Helmut 2010-04-26 13:12
- Dataset yjlee168 2010-04-26 08:16
- Dataset Helmut 2010-04-26 01:13
- dilemma yjlee168 2010-04-26 08:41
- Equal variances d_labes 2010-04-26 09:04
- Equal variances yjlee168 2010-04-26 09:22
- GLM = Equal variances d_labes 2010-04-26 13:29
- GLM = Equal variances Helmut 2010-04-26 14:45
- I'm a believer d_labes 2010-04-26 15:58
- I'm a believer Helmut 2010-04-26 16:31
- I'm a believer d_labes 2010-04-26 15:58
- GLM = Equal variances Helmut 2010-04-26 14:45
- GLM = Equal variances d_labes 2010-04-26 13:29
- Equal variances Helmut 2010-04-26 12:55
- gls() for unequal variances? d_labes 2010-04-26 16:36
- gls() for unequal variances? Helmut 2010-04-26 17:00
- Sims Helmut 2010-04-27 01:36
- Sandwich - Simsalabim d_labes 2010-04-28 10:58
- Sandwich - Simsalabim Helmut 2010-04-28 14:19
- parametrization of R function rlnorm martin 2010-05-02 18:22
- Mean of log-normal d_labes 2010-05-03 16:22
- parametrization of R function rlnorm ElMaestro 2013-07-26 21:42
- Martin‽ Helmut 2013-07-28 02:01
- Sandwich - Simsalabim d_labes 2010-04-28 10:58
- gls() for unequal variances? d_labes 2010-04-26 16:36
- Equal variances yjlee168 2010-04-26 09:22
- Dataset yjlee168 2010-04-25 22:44
- Validating vs. WinNonlin... Helmut 2010-04-24 00:28
- Modelling Parallel bears yjlee168 2010-04-23 21:14
- Modelling Parallel bears d_labes 2010-04-23 09:12
- Parallel bears meeting at random in infinity ElMaestro 2010-04-22 12:53