Validating vs. WinNonlin... [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2010-04-24 21:36 (5105 d 19:43 ago) – Posting: # 5213
Views: 55,862

Dear Helmut, d_labes and ElMaestro,

Thank you all for your great inputs and suggestions in this thread. We have decided to rewrite the codes of bear in the part of parallel BE study.

❝ D. Labes referred to one of my old posts: WinNonlin's method (assuming equal variances) is flawed - even in the current releases


❝ Agreeing with D. Labes in the top post I would also use a t-test for unequal variances. That's the default of t.test and in conformity with FDA's requirements. For simple code see the subsequent post in the quoted thread.


I see. Thanks again.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.1:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,651 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5