Correction to EMA Final BE-GL [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-03-28 19:28 (5920 d 07:14 ago) – Posting: # 4978
Views: 5,187

Dear all,

a correction (dated 10 March 2010) was published recently. The new Doc. Ref.: CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev. 1/Corr

Changes (apart from a few typos):
p10, 4th paragraph: 'kcal' instead of 'calories' ;-)
p15, 5th paragraph: In specific cases of products with a narrow therapeutic range, the acceptance interval for AUC may need to be tightened (see section 4.1.9).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
148 visitors (0 registered, 148 guests [including 55 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5