Sample size for a pilot study to estimate the CVintra [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-03-02 03:19 (5953 d 01:13 ago) – Posting: # 4848
Views: 16,450

Hi ElMaestro!

❝ 4 to 6 in a pilot trial sounds like it may result in a CVintra that is too poorly estimated. There are no rules, and 'poorly' is in this regard purely my personal subjective unqualified view.


No, 'poorly' is not purely your personal view, but qualified by the table from my previous post. Part:
 n  10%   15%   20%   30%   40%   50%
 6  15.6  23.6  31.6  48.2  65.8  84.8
16  12.2  18.3  24.4  36.9  49.5  62.5


If we calculate a CVintra of 20% in the pilot (n=6), the upper 80% CL of the CVintra is 31.6%. In other words there is a 20% chance that the CV might even be higher than 31.6%. If the pilot study study is larger (n=16), the estimated CV gets more reliable (=less uncertain) with 24.4%.

You are right with the sequential designs. If I don't have a lot (!) of previous data, I made them already my new standard.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
173 visitors (0 registered, 173 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5