ANOVA only - no doubts [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-02-12 22:09 (5964 d 03:31 ago) – Posting: # 4757
Views: 26,937

Dear HS,

ANOVA only. Full stop.


This is becoming more and more mysterious. Anova and mixed effects modeling are not mutually exclusive, and it sounds to me like they have not realised the difference between a model and an anova.
They will sooner or later realise that if the guideline in its present form is to be followed there is no way to come up with correctly estimated intra-subject variabilities in a replicated study.
Furthermore, the entire section 4.1.10 has no relevance unless mixed modeling is used.

This is regrettable.
EM.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
157 visitors (0 registered, 157 guests [including 61 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5