RSABE (EU) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-01-06 18:01 (6012 d 14:55 ago) – Posting: # 4565
Views: 5,922

Dear Raveendranath!

❝ We want to conduct a study with partial replicated design (Reference twice)

❝ for Europe regulatory. My doubt is


❝ 1. Does the Europe Regulatory accepts the Scaled Average Bioequivalence

❝ method for highly variable drugs?


Right now: No, though there are rumours, that RSABE will 'make it' to the final BE-Guideline (for Cmax only) - but we have to wait until publication (March 2010?).

❝ 2. If we can show that the Intra cv for reference product is > 30% then

❝ can we use wider limits (75-133)?


Yes. According to 2006's Q&A-document (Sections 2 and 8), if clinical justifiable (high variability of the reference alone is not enough).
It's important that you power your study to show BE for the case that CV<30%.
Example: expected CV 40%, expected T/R 95%, power 80%, n for a partial replicate design with 75%-133% = 36; if CV in the study = 29 (no widening; AR 80%-125% applicable), T/R 95.5%.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5