Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-10-17 00:06 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

No paper, pencil, brain :-( [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2009-09-22 18:22  - Posting: # 4231
Views: 15,163

Dear Yuvraj!

» 90% CI for Upper limit=1.329927721 which is nearly equal to 1.33 [image]
» 90% CI for Lower limit=1.07998416 which is nearly equal to 1.08 [image]
»
» Is it right, Sir?

Oops, you got me! :ok:
You are rightand I am wrong.
If I use values with no rounding I get exactly 1.08 and 1.33 up to the numeric precision of my machine.
Lesion learned: Never trust in an old fart with a pocket calculator too lazy to fire up some statistical software.
Terribly sorry for the confusion…

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,394 Posts in 3,725 Threads, 1,071 registered users;
25 users online (0 registered, 25 guests).

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed