Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-08-18 01:13 CEST (UTC+2h)

No paper, pencil, brain :-( [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2009-09-22 18:22  - Posting: # 4231
Views: 14,945

Dear Yuvraj!

» 90% CI for Upper limit=1.329927721 which is nearly equal to 1.33 [image]
» 90% CI for Lower limit=1.07998416 which is nearly equal to 1.08 [image]
» Is it right, Sir?

Oops, you got me! :ok:
You are rightand I am wrong.
If I use values with no rounding I get exactly 1.08 and 1.33 up to the numeric precision of my machine.
Lesion learned: Never trust in an old fart with a pocket calculator too lazy to fire up some statistical software.
Terribly sorry for the confusion…

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,204 Posts in 3,684 Threads, 1,054 registered users;
25 users online (0 registered, 25 guests).

Statistics is the art of never having to say you’re wrong.
Variance is what any two statisticians are at.    C.J. Bradfield

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz