Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168  – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2009-08-27 00:29 (6135 d 23:49 ago) – Posting: # 4119
Views: 15,872

Dear ElMaestro,

Thanks for your interesting and great posting. Could you tell me where you got this? Many thanks.

❝ than "Subj : Seq" (example here). Subjects nested in sequences is just the same as Sequences nested in Subjects to a numbercruncher working on bits and bytes. However, to me in practice, speaking of Subjects in Sequence makes some sense whereas speaking of Sequences in Subjects is meaningless.

It clarifies the puzzle that we have when developing bear.

Complete thread:

• Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-26 20:54 [🇷 for BE/BA] 
  • Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax!yjlee168 2009-08-26 22:29
    • Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-26 22:46
      • Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-27 20:54
        • Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-27 22:14
  • Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-27 22:26
    • Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-27 22:46
    • Simple solution ElMaestro 2009-08-27 23:53
      • Simple solution yjlee168 2009-09-07 01:53
        • Type III SS again ElMaestro 2009-09-07 15:47
          • Type III SS again yjlee168 2009-09-07 18:08
            • Type III SS again ElMaestro 2009-09-07 19:53