Regulators truncated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-06-18 09:26  – Posting: # 3872
Views: 17,692

Dear Ohlbe, dear Jaime, dear all,

let me share some experience with regulators in the EMEA. In a recent submission of a BE study with a long half-life product (t1/2 from literature about 50-70 h) we submitted an evaluation with AUC(0-72h), Cmax and tmax as metrics, the typical truncated area setting.

Regulators response:
The Germans asked for AUC(0-inf)!
The French asked for lamdaZ (kel) and t1/2!


Hopefully they will not ask for residual area <20% :angry: .

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,134 posts in 4,245 threads, 1,383 registered users;
online 21 (0 registered, 21 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 20:22 CET

Be very, very careful what you put into that head,
because you will never, ever get it out.    Thomas Wolsey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5