Regulators truncated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-06-18 07:26  – Posting: # 3872
Views: 18,861

Dear Ohlbe, dear Jaime, dear all,

let me share some experience with regulators in the EMEA. In a recent submission of a BE study with a long half-life product (t1/2 from literature about 50-70 h) we submitted an evaluation with AUC(0-72h), Cmax and tmax as metrics, the typical truncated area setting.

Regulators response:
The Germans asked for AUC(0-inf)!
The French asked for lamdaZ (kel) and t1/2!


Hopefully they will not ask for residual area <20% :angry: .

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,815 posts in 4,356 threads, 1,447 registered users;
online 15 (1 registered, 14 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:07 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth.    Franklin D. Roosevelt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5