Moses CI [Nonparametrics]

posted by Dr Andrew Leary – Ireland, 2009-01-27 12:41 (6348 d 00:33 ago) – Posting: # 3136
Views: 19,564

Thank you both for your responses.

I had not picked up that point during my hasty reading of the new (draft) guideline, Helmut, but saw your extensive discussions of same when looking at the forum yesterday evening.

At present all our BE protocols stick with the old guideline and require non-parametric assessment of Tmax. I can foresee a time in 2 years when we'll have to repeat part of every analysis to provide parametric results. Are you sure that this aspect of the new guideline will stick? I'm a clinician not a statistician, but it seems to me that perfroming parametric stats on a small amount of categorical data flies in the face of traditional teaching.

Kind regards

Andrew

--
Edit: Full quote removed. Please see this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
99 visitors (0 registered, 99 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5