Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  2018-07-22 16:24 CEST (UTC+2h)

Raw data (paper vs. electronic) [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2009-01-21 12:31  - Posting: # 3085
Views: 15,695

Dear Martin!

» […] in general data are used as they appear on the page but with electronic flies the situation is less obvious. some electronic file format is ambiguous concerning correct interpretation and presentation of the file contents. in MS excel, numbers may rounded internally (for example you see 2.35 but the correct number is 2.354324).

Electronic flies? :-D

See one of my lectures (slides 65-66) concerning rounding. If results have to be recalculated from printouts, results may differ if the original evaluation was based on full precision data - which may lead to avoidable discussions…

» I personally prefer to use CSV (ASCII) files which is an open format […]

Wonderful! This is exactly what I want from my clients. Additionally an MD5-checksum should be used to maintain data integrity. If data-files are attached to an e-mail, the checksum should be sent in a separate e-mail.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,547 posts in 3,941 threads, 1,191 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 11 identified bots]).

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed