SAP? [Software]

posted by Mahmoud  – Jordan, 2020-07-03 19:17 (1389 d 23:54 ago) – Posting: # 21648
Views: 4,559

Dear Dr

Thank you very much for your information

in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that

CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies

From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra

I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results

❝ Are you trying to “rescue” a failed study?


No


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,649 registered users;
59 visitors (1 registered, 58 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5