protocol amendment that may trigger Group effect test [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-03-24 09:07 (253 d 14:17 ago) – Posting: # 21298
Views: 1,342

Hi Silke,

» Situation:
» 1st period was dosed in 1 group and completed in CRO 1
» 2nd period must now be performed at a different CRO (CRO 2)
» 2nd period must be performed in 2 groups in CRO 2

That's annoying :-)

» Protocol amendment:
» Switch in CRO including all tasks
» due to the change of dosing in 1 group to 2 groups in period 2 the washout will be different between the two groups.
» Does this trigger the evaluation of a group effect, although the groups may only be separated by 1 week?
» Is there special statistics we need to consider to address this properly?

In my opinion it is not overly informative to do a group analysis here, at least not within the fit which provides for the evaluation of BE (here it is a kind of "accidental group within period within CRO", where period somehow is indistinguishable from CRO :surprised::ponder:).

Can you switch the volunteers to the other CRO, or has it become a parallel trial rather than a crossover trial by now?

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,232 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 23:25 CET (Europe/Vienna)

A big data-analyst is an expert
in producing misleading conclusions from huge datasets.
It is much more efficient to use a statistician,
who can do the same with small ones.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz