Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Very, very strange! [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2019-10-31 20:43 (1635 d 12:33 ago) – Posting: # 20739
Views: 4,562

Hi Helmut,

❝ I could confirm that in Phoenix WinNonlin 8.1 (multiplied the first T value of the EMA’s reference data sets by 10)...

❝ I 2144.00 2479.70

❝ 2143.04 2517.74

Very strange in deed. I just got the same result in SAS (2144--> 2143.04). I only have time to test the data set 1. I guess it's probably the RTFM time for us. Maybe Detlew has some insight. I'll check the SAS manual after his comment

Complete thread:

• Least square mean calculation for the fully replicate design Jaimik Patel 2019-10-31 11:19 [General Sta­tis­tics] 
  • Very, very strange! Helmut 2019-10-31 14:36
    • Very, very strange!Shuanghe 2019-10-31 19:43
      • Very, very strange! Helmut 2019-10-31 19:50
    • Very, very strange! Jaimik Patel 2019-11-02 12:26
      • G matrix mittyri 2019-11-03 01:38
  • Inner workings of REML ElMaestro 2019-10-31 19:48
    • Even in ANOVA… Helmut 2019-10-31 19:53
      • Even in 2x2... zizou 2019-11-01 21:05
        • trying to understand emmeans mittyri 2019-11-02 02:26
  • Least square mean calculation for the fully replicate design PharmCat 2019-11-03 00:46