Very, very strange! [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2019-10-31 20:43 (2069 d 02:25 ago) – Posting: # 20739
Views: 6,561

Hi Helmut,

❝ I could confirm that in Phoenix WinNonlin 8.1 (multiplied the first T value of the EMA’s reference data sets by 10)...


❝ I 2144.00 2479.70

2143.04 2517.74


Very strange in deed. I just got the same result in SAS (2144--> 2143.04). I only have time to test the data set 1. I guess it's probably the RTFM time for us. Maybe Detlew has some insight. I'll check the SAS manual after his comment :-D

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,680 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I think it is much more interesting to live with uncertainty
than to live with answers that might be wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5