Emesis criteria for study comparing IR vs. MR formulations [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by nobody – 2019-10-16 15:22 (461 d 16:30 ago) – Posting: # 20694
Views: 2,339

» MR: Since you likely are facing flip-flop PK (where the late part of the profile represents absorption).

...which is "very conservative", to say the least (and stay politicialy correct....)


btw. since when do you load scripts from cloudf**k for the forum? Don't like...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,306 posts in 4,443 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 06:53 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5