Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Run ≠ batch?

Run ≠ batch? [Bioanalytics]

posted by nobody – 2019-09-23 10:36 (1667 d 15:19 ago) – Posting: # 20638
Views: 5,623

A slightly different calibration function not necessarily leads to "different" (from what, btw. We simply don't know the correct concentration of any given analyte in a volunteer sample...) concentrations calculated, as the signal for the volunteer samples might change accordingly.

Again: Which systematic, non-random effects between batches do you assume here?

—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Crossover: samples of p1 and p2 in different batches? Ravuri sindhura 2019-09-18 19:16 [Bioanalytics]
- Crossover: samples of p1 and p2 in different batches? dshah 2019-09-19 09:16
  - Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect Helmut 2019-09-19 15:33
    - Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? Ohlbe 2019-09-19 15:50
      - Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? Helmut 2019-09-19 15:59
        
        Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? nobody 2019-09-19 16:21
        
        Almost entirely OT Helmut 2019-09-19 17:22
        
        Almost entirely OT nobody 2019-09-19 17:46
        
        Completely OT Helmut 2019-09-19 18:08
        
        Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? dshah 2019-09-20 07:52
        
        Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? nobody 2019-09-20 08:00
        Run ≠ batch? Helmut 2019-09-20 09:42
        
        Run ≠ batch Ohlbe 2019-09-20 10:37
        Run ≠ batch? dshah 2019-09-23 07:43
        
        Run ≠ batch?nobody 2019-09-23 08:36
    - Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect Ravuri sindhura 2019-09-23 13:04